Simulating the water footprint of woodies in Aquacrop and Apex

Poppe, Mick (2016) Simulating the water footprint of woodies in Aquacrop and Apex.

Abstract:As the crop cultivation sector is the largest human water consumer, models that simulate its water use are important in global water studies. Within this sector, herbaceous plants and woody plants can be discriminated. Aquacrop is a plant simulation model very capable of simulating herbaceous plants, but the carry-over e�ects from one year to another, the large number of plant varieties and the more complicated evaporation and transpiration behaviour make the relative simple model not suited for the simulation of woodies. Apex is a model capable of simulating both herbaceous and woody plants, but the constant that drives biomass growth changes over the seasons and locations and loses its linearity in stress conditions. This study compares the Aquacrop and Apex in the simulation of woody plants. For this the yield, the evapotranspiration and the water footprint resulting from these are important. From the plants with the largest harvested areas, the apple tree, the grapevine, the olive tree and the oil palm are selected as four important plants that will be simulated in this study. Each of these plants is simulated on a �eld level in the region where their core production is located. To make a comparison between the two very di�erent models possible, the input and the processes in Aquacrop and Apex are harmonized. To allow for a simulation of woody plants, Aquacrop only simulates the yearly foliage development of an already full-grown tree. Apex can simulate the plant development in the �rst years that characterize woodies. For a full-grown woody plant, Aquacrop and Apex show di�erent yields and evapotranspiration rates because of di�erences in input, parametrization and model structure. Aquacrop and Apex show roughly the same yield patterns in irrigated conditions, but in rainfed conditions large di�erences can occur. The evapotranspiration rates are very similar in rainfed conditions, but in irrigated conditions they deviate a lot from each other. When we compare the yield with literature, both models in general overestimate the yield. The evapotranspiration is in accordance with literature values. The climatic variability in uences the yields and evapotranspiration rates. In both models the evapotranspiration responds very realistically to yearly climate uctuations. The yield in Aquacrop also responds as expected, but the yield in Apex is dominated by a model processes that does not correspond to the climatic variability. The in uence of the soil is limited in Apex, while it can have a large e�ect on especially the yield in Aquacrop. The development phase of woody plants is important for the lifelong average yields, because the �rst years of a plants life are characterized by a rather low yield. The evapotranspiration rate also changes over the �rst years, but the e�ect of the development phase is negligible for the lifelong average evapotranspiration. When we take the development of yield into account for the calculation of the water footprint, it becomes visible that the water footprints in irrigated conditions are quite similar between the models, while in rainfed conditions they can di�er quite a lot because of the di�erence in yield underlying the water footprint. Compared to the literature also large di�erences can occur. Both models show their limitations. Because of this, additional research is required to compare the models under a wider scope. A case study can help to �nd more reliable estimates for the parameter values in the models. From this study alone, it cannot be concluded that one model is better than another. When simulating woodies, Aquacrop does not seem to be inferior to Apex, despite the fact that Aquacrop model is not designed for these plants.
Item Type:Essay (Master)
Faculty:ET: Engineering Technology
Subject:56 civil engineering
Programme:Civil Engineering and Management MSc (60026)
Link to this item:
Export this item as:BibTeX
HTML Citation
Reference Manager


Repository Staff Only: item control page