University of Twente Student Theses
Kadaster Ethical Data Instrument (KEDI): An instrument for assessing external data requests
Bolte, PJ (2022) Kadaster Ethical Data Instrument (KEDI): An instrument for assessing external data requests.
|
PDF
906kB |
| Abstract: | Kadaster collects and registers administrative and spatial data on properties and the rights involved. Kadaster has the judicial obligation to share this data if it is legally allowed. H owever, sharing this data can cause issues of fairness, responsibility , and respect for human rights. To prevent these issues Kadaster aims for an ethical approach to external data sharing. The Kadaster Ethical Data Instrument (KEDI) supports this ethical approach examining The design of the external data sharing requests. KEDI followed the design science research methodology. The KEDI has been designed within two iterative cycles. Within the first cycle, three stakeholders were interviewed. Based on the results from the stakeholder's interview a prototype instrument was des igned. The prototype instrument was input for the second cycle. Within the second cycle, three experts were interviewed about instrument resulting in additional feedback. Th the feedback. The interviews pointed out that the e KEDI has changed according to KEDI should provide a structured way that can recognize the nuances of specific cases. The structured way should guide the dialogue between the participants of the instrument. Dialogue is necessary for creating good argumentation to assess external data sh aring requests according to respondents. The dialogue should be guided by KEDI and KEDI should focus on values. However, the respondents could not agree on which values the KEDI should focus on. This might be caused by the lack of consensus on the definiti on and scope of ethics within Kadaster. From the KEDI main components can be abstracted for designing an ethical argumentation instrument. The first component of an ethical argumentation instrument is that of dialogue. Dialogue is necessary for creating g ood argumentation. The second component of an ethical argumentation instrument is that of values. The focus of an ethical argumentation instrument should be on values. However, to determine values for the instrument there should be consensus about the defi nition and scope of ethics within the organization design of an ethical argumentation instrument. |
| Item Type: | Essay (Master) |
| Clients: | Kadaster |
| Faculty: | BMS: Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences |
| Programme: | Business Administration MSc (60644) |
| Link to this item: | https://purl.utwente.nl/essays/93147 |
| Export this item as: | BibTeX EndNote HTML Citation Reference Manager |
Show download statistics for this publication
Show download statistics for this publicationRepository Staff Only: item control page